Antagonists Wiki
Advertisement

Reliable info isn't always from other sources[]

I would like to mention that many of you immitate the rather pathetic behaviour of Villains Wiki, as you may be confused with the true story. She was first of all pointed out to be Hux's henchwoman, much like Kylo Ren. Hux was the one incharge of The Starkiller Base, and yes, he was Snoke's right hand, and Kylo Ren did report to him,and so did Phasma. Second, she gave the order to burn the village, and she was similar to the rank of Kylo Ren, who had to agree with her methods. That makes her apparently a murderer and spree killer. Third, I am mentioning again that General Hux is the conspirator behind the entire plot of the film, and that he did commit crimes like destroying The Republic and kidnapping kids with his team, thus turning them to Stormtroopers. You may not realize that this wiki should be more reliable than others. Thanks. HuxRen123 (talk) 18:43, January 6, 2017 (UTC)

My only source for removing what you put in came from what I remember of the movie after seeing it two times. If you like, I'll pop the DVD in the player and provide a moment-by-moment analysis of her actions in that movie. However, if you are going to make a statement about reliability, then you should work to provide reliable information yourself. Here is what you said a few hours ago:
  • "goal: To help Finn and his allies (possibly)"
    The closest I can think of that might barely qualify for this is when she was held at gunpoint so that Finn, Han and Chewie could get past a few guards, but that's forced cooperation, not something she did willingly.
  • "and will return in Star Wars: Episode VIII, either as one of the major antagonists or an anti-heroine"
    What are you basing this information on? What press release or news article did this come from? It wasn't from a movie trailer since none have been released yet.
  • "fate = Supports Finn and becomes his servant, but informs him he did a big mistake against Hux"
    Where in the movie was it shown that Phasma became Finn's servant. Being held at gunpoint doesn't qualify as becoming someone's servant.
  • Category:Vandals
    What did she vandalize in the movie?
  • Category:Redeemed Villains
    What did she do that supposedly led to her being redeemed? She didn't give up being a member of the First Order.
  • Categories: Reformed Villains, Reformed Antagonists, Probably Reformed Villains
    Likewise, what did she supposedly do that led her to being reformed or even "probably" reformed?
  • Category:Remorseful Antagonists
    At what point in the movie did she express any kind of regret about the life she had?
  • Category:Tragic Villains
    There was nothing in the movie about her history, so saying that she's "tragic" is speculation.
  • Category:Traitors
    She was not shown abandoning the First Order to help the Rebel Alliance, and she was never shown to be a part of the Rebel Alliance, so she is not a traitor to either side. Being held at gunpoint to ensure cooperation is not being a traitor.
  • Category:Destroyer of Innocence
    She was shown as already being in charge of Stormtroopers at the time we see her in the movie and we did not see any of the training/conditioning of those people, so we do not know if Phasma had any part in destroying anyone's innocence.
  • Category:Spree-Killer
    Soldiers acting upon orders may kill a lot of people, but that's not the same as a spree-killing.
  • Category:Saboteur
    What or who did she commit sabotage against?
  • Category:Spoiled Brats
    When in the movie did she have a temper tantrum like you see young children have?
  • Category:Pawns
    Where in the movie was it revealed that she was being manipulated into actions she wouldn't otherwise have committed?
  • Category:Dictators
    She has a higher level of authority as a member of the First Order, but where was it shown she was ultimately in charge?
None of those things happened in the movie, so that does not make you a very reliable source of information by your own words. —RRabbit42 (leave a message) 04:00, January 7, 2017 (UTC)
Advertisement